Originally posted by MrKirov
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Best PS1 and PS2 image on a 1080p display
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by dataDave View PostWon't there be even more additional lag with the PS3 and PS4 considering they're software emulating the BC?
I mean the PS3/4's emulation might have lag, but there's no reason to think that until you try it.
Comment
-
Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but one advantage of the Framemeister over the OSSC when it comes to 480i is that the Framemeister does very sharp deinterlacing of the image, where as the OSSC just displays the interlaced image as a CRT would, half of the lines at any one time. The Framemeister does add approx 20ms of lag, although that's nothing compared with the PS3 emulating the PS2, which I believe is a minimum of 3 frames. The Framemeister also costs more than the OSSC.
Of course whether you prefer a sharper image is down to personal preference. I know some people like to blur the PS2 image a bit to make the jaggies softer.
Whatever expensive scalers you throw at it, I do think the PS2 benefits from a CRT, even more so than 8/16 bit machines do.
If you have a spare hour, this is a very comprehensive guide to getting the best picture from the PS2.
Last edited by ZipZap; 16-03-2018, 11:58.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Asura View PostNot inherently, no. Emulators don't necessarily have any more lag than native games.
For RPGs and stuff that's fine, but if you're going to be playing shmups, fighters and precision platformers it could be an issue.
Comment
-
Originally posted by UKGamer View Posterm, is it sacrilegious to suggest retroarch/PCSX2. Assuming you have a gaming capable system - you can res the games up and they'll look and play great...
Comment
Comment