Arguing over marks out of ten?

[Ouenben]

No score system has ever beaten the Gamezville G's system and you all know it

"I is givin it 5 G's, cos itz like well wickid innit".

Once they gave the terrible (And so they mentioned) Space raiders 4/5 I think, because it had the original space invaders in it!

[muse hunter]

the old cvg 'high five' was good enough for me.

i believe it the best way to review games, you can't say this game is only 86% good or whatever , but with a mark out of five it gives the opinion of the reviewer as well as some space for the reader's opinion, it casual it feels like an opinion unlike a percentage that can feel like a score that is forced onto the reader.

[muse hunter]

I thought everyone knew this?
Actually most of our forum members are just staff accounts to generate traffic. There's only 3 real members on the boards (jk)

so this means i either don't exsist or i've been talking to myself for the past year?

*rings mental institute in panic begging to be taken away*

[Brats]

Most people only use reviews as a method of buying stuff, so reviews should be marked out of one. 0/1 means don't buy it, 1/1 means buy it. Anything else is superfluous.

I name it the binary rating system and it shall make my fortune.

[Brats]

Double post.

[Brats]

Triple Post!

[Reef]

Games should be given 1 of 3 ratings:

1. Classic - everyone should own this (very rare to give out, but buying these games would give you a perfect well rounded collection)
2. Buy it if you like this genre
3. Don't buy it

Simple eh