I have read a few reviews of Rockstars Tennis and nothwithstanding its potential greatness, why are these bloody reviewers saying that 'at the budget price of ?30' it's great value!
When did ?30 for a game become cheap?
The current 360 SRP of ?50 is way too high anyway. Yes you can find them for ?40, but compared to the historic benchmark of ?30 on release, and then much lower soon after, it annoys me when suddenly the media decree ?30 to be budget, it is not! Goodness knows what the PS3 games will cost, and who knows when someone will decide ?50 to be a budget price!
Oh and before anyone starts citing development costs for 360 games, it's bollocks. It they were (as some are) realeased on PC's they are ?30 (max).
So journos, ?30 is not budget, stop PR'ing that it is.
When did ?30 for a game become cheap?
The current 360 SRP of ?50 is way too high anyway. Yes you can find them for ?40, but compared to the historic benchmark of ?30 on release, and then much lower soon after, it annoys me when suddenly the media decree ?30 to be budget, it is not! Goodness knows what the PS3 games will cost, and who knows when someone will decide ?50 to be a budget price!
Oh and before anyone starts citing development costs for 360 games, it's bollocks. It they were (as some are) realeased on PC's they are ?30 (max).
So journos, ?30 is not budget, stop PR'ing that it is.
Comment