After getting an email asking about SNES games UN Squadron and NBA Jam, I got to thinking about the issues regarding retro games that are attached to licences.
I'll copy and paste the reply I gave to this email:
It's something I hadn't really given that much thought to. We're all aware of the Goldeneye issue, and Nintendo have assured us that they're working on it, but that is a game that would be downloaded millions of times thanks to the fact that it's so popular - Nintendo have the incentive to make a deal work. But why would companies (such as Capcom, in the case of UN Squardon) renew potentially expensive licences just to release a VC game that will make them a tiny bit of money in the long run?
To the best of my knowledge UN Sqaudron hasn't appeared on any Capcom retro pack (please correct me if I'm wrong).
As for NBA Jam...what fate lies with games that come from dead publishers?
I think it would be a big shame if certain classic games never see the light of day again due to these factors.
Discuss!
I'll copy and paste the reply I gave to this email:
Originally posted by Me
To the best of my knowledge UN Sqaudron hasn't appeared on any Capcom retro pack (please correct me if I'm wrong).
As for NBA Jam...what fate lies with games that come from dead publishers?
I think it would be a big shame if certain classic games never see the light of day again due to these factors.
Discuss!
Comment