gamesTM 71 Scores

[Paulos G]

Commando - 5

Matty am cry

Give the demo a whirl Matty. We can hope for the best.

[Ouenben]

What have they said about Call of Duty: World At War?

what is this? Cant find any info about this title.

[ezee ryder]

It is Call of Duty 5 developed by Treyarch, same guys that did Call of Duty 3.

[Malc]

So basically, ignore it with one eye, but use the other in case Treyarch pull something special out of the bag.

[gaz@manc]

Apparently Treyarch were given the COD4 tech to develop Quantum of Solace, so theres a good chance World at War will utilise Modern Warfare's engine. Of course, just cos the techs there doesn't mean the execution will be any good

[Malc]

Very true gaz, they didn't do COD3 very well - at least not after the sublime COD2 - and I don't have high hopes for COD5. Even if they do take the brilliant engine and tech' that IW created, I bet that it'll still be worse than COD4.

[dvdmike]

Do they have screens of COD?

[Kaladron]

Do they have screens of COD?

Yep. It's an 8-page preview feature with loads of screens and a developer interview.

[MattyD]

The feature on NDAs and the NDA-bound MGS4 reviews aren't appearing together by coincidence much then are they

It's definately a fair point though. When you have a situation like this where reviews have to dance around the subject matter instead of actually discussing it because of 'agreements' forced by the publishers it's little wonder games writing gets so little respect.

[The Mole]

Can't help but think the reviewer lost the point of Boom Blox.

Also Target: Terror - 4 that is being far to generous when you compare that to Track and Field which scored 5 and is fun for more than 30 seconds.