I am confused. Did people on here want to see Nintendo go under? Well maybe thats extreme, but at least withdraw from the home console market.
The reason i ask this question, is people seam to be very against the casual game stance Nintendo is taking. I am one of those people. However if you take a look back to last generation and the problems Nintendo had, they came third, which when you consider that was based on sales from Japan, as well as other regions which Microsoft did not have.
If they had brought out another bog standard console, they would have most likely lost out to the power of the PS3 and Xbox 360. I think this would have resulted in developers focusing on PS3 and 360 which won the battle last time.
Nintendo had to take a different tact, their name to the mainstream gamers was/is mud, the only way to keep Nintendo around i feel, was to do something like this. To me The Wii and DS are the best it could have been, yes plenty of crap, but you always get that with the leading console, just look at how much crap software the PS2 has.
I am happy to settle for the odd hardcore game from Nintendo. Mario and Zelda games are in development for Wii and we have Animal Crossing and Captain Rainbow for this year.
Is this the best we could have hoped for?
What do you think would have happened if Nintendo had tried to go for power over innovation again?
I will be interested to hear your thoughts.
The reason i ask this question, is people seam to be very against the casual game stance Nintendo is taking. I am one of those people. However if you take a look back to last generation and the problems Nintendo had, they came third, which when you consider that was based on sales from Japan, as well as other regions which Microsoft did not have.
If they had brought out another bog standard console, they would have most likely lost out to the power of the PS3 and Xbox 360. I think this would have resulted in developers focusing on PS3 and 360 which won the battle last time.
Nintendo had to take a different tact, their name to the mainstream gamers was/is mud, the only way to keep Nintendo around i feel, was to do something like this. To me The Wii and DS are the best it could have been, yes plenty of crap, but you always get that with the leading console, just look at how much crap software the PS2 has.
I am happy to settle for the odd hardcore game from Nintendo. Mario and Zelda games are in development for Wii and we have Animal Crossing and Captain Rainbow for this year.
Is this the best we could have hoped for?
What do you think would have happened if Nintendo had tried to go for power over innovation again?
I will be interested to hear your thoughts.
Comment