My gaming backlog is ridiculously huge and this factor often puts me off gaming at points because I get stressed at how much I actually have 'to do', gaming-wise (when I seriously believe gaming should be a stress-relieving hobby!) I get so many BIG games out of the way, then decide to concentrate my efforts on other stuff I have, maybe stuff that's less appealing to my personal gaming tastes.
So I start stuff like Venetica, The Club, Wet, Lost: Via Domus, and I complete some and mostly don't complete the rest and I get rid of a few DVD-sized bits of space via trading 'em in and I watch films for a bit, then get stuck back into some of the BIG games in my collection, etcetera.
I'm in that small phase right now. I'm on the aforementioned Lost: Via Domus, and am enjoying it quite heartily, I am seriously, pleasantly surprised by it.
So heartened by the above, I made a pledge to myself to do a complete playthru of GRAW1, a game which rubs against certain gaming conventions that I find hard to generate enthusiasm for (ie. launchgameitis, squad-based "tactics", etc.). Strategy. For instance, when playing the Full Spectrum Warrior games, which are as simple as f*ck, strategy-wise, I just can't handle/don't like that shizzle. I often shy from boring-seeming complexity. That's the type of gamer I am, I figure that though GRAW's not my usual type of game, it was received so well that it MUST have many good things going for it, surely?????
So I'm gonna stick to my word and I am gonna BLAST this unappealing bast of an old game.
In essence, this thread is all about choosing to play games that one would never really wish to play, and the possible benefits/deficits of choosing said options.
So, to kick off, before staring GRAW, I'm currently on Lost: Via Domus on 360.
I watched Lost on Channel 4 to about three quarters of the way into season 2, to the point where everything went all bleary, like the writers were still deciding, and it felt very stagnant and I felt like I was wasting my time, despite me still enjoying the show. So I sort of like the show but really have no interest in it and I know people who are heavily into this junk and take it really seriously(!). And the game, it's good. Not in a Dark Souls type of way, but it's a proper f*cking nice way to do a TV show licence, this really does capture the 'feel' of the show, and the basic adventuring you're offered ticks along quite nicely, with some quite unexpected bouts of graphical excellence (the torchlit cave sequences look and feel exquisitely atmospheric, and channel a bit of that From Software magic in how they feel.) It's really simple, it's very nicely produced, for ?1.98 (in the GAME firesale, earlier this year) it's pretty fab. And I hear it's verrrrry short. In 2hrs, think I'm about 62% in. I appreciate short retail games, these days.
So, anyway, please talk about the games you're playing that you didn't really want to be playing.
So I start stuff like Venetica, The Club, Wet, Lost: Via Domus, and I complete some and mostly don't complete the rest and I get rid of a few DVD-sized bits of space via trading 'em in and I watch films for a bit, then get stuck back into some of the BIG games in my collection, etcetera.
I'm in that small phase right now. I'm on the aforementioned Lost: Via Domus, and am enjoying it quite heartily, I am seriously, pleasantly surprised by it.
So heartened by the above, I made a pledge to myself to do a complete playthru of GRAW1, a game which rubs against certain gaming conventions that I find hard to generate enthusiasm for (ie. launchgameitis, squad-based "tactics", etc.). Strategy. For instance, when playing the Full Spectrum Warrior games, which are as simple as f*ck, strategy-wise, I just can't handle/don't like that shizzle. I often shy from boring-seeming complexity. That's the type of gamer I am, I figure that though GRAW's not my usual type of game, it was received so well that it MUST have many good things going for it, surely?????
So I'm gonna stick to my word and I am gonna BLAST this unappealing bast of an old game.
In essence, this thread is all about choosing to play games that one would never really wish to play, and the possible benefits/deficits of choosing said options.
So, to kick off, before staring GRAW, I'm currently on Lost: Via Domus on 360.
I watched Lost on Channel 4 to about three quarters of the way into season 2, to the point where everything went all bleary, like the writers were still deciding, and it felt very stagnant and I felt like I was wasting my time, despite me still enjoying the show. So I sort of like the show but really have no interest in it and I know people who are heavily into this junk and take it really seriously(!). And the game, it's good. Not in a Dark Souls type of way, but it's a proper f*cking nice way to do a TV show licence, this really does capture the 'feel' of the show, and the basic adventuring you're offered ticks along quite nicely, with some quite unexpected bouts of graphical excellence (the torchlit cave sequences look and feel exquisitely atmospheric, and channel a bit of that From Software magic in how they feel.) It's really simple, it's very nicely produced, for ?1.98 (in the GAME firesale, earlier this year) it's pretty fab. And I hear it's verrrrry short. In 2hrs, think I'm about 62% in. I appreciate short retail games, these days.
So, anyway, please talk about the games you're playing that you didn't really want to be playing.

Comment