Originally posted by yashiro
The DC hardware was never designed to last beyond the ordinary system life cycle which means that it was planned that the product would sunset in 03 with new hardware due either then or later this year. The fact is that the DC hardware doesn't have what it takes to be in it for the long haul.
Now while the DC hardware couldn't do it, The NAOMI architecture the DC hardware was based on could. The Naomi 2 would be a better platform to put in the home since it has four times the main memory and four times the graphics memory of the DC. It also has two rather kick ass cache rich GPU Cores which allow it to throw out some amazing graphics.
That's something you could do a Neo-Geo with and stay somewhat competitive with what ever the other three guys are coming out with next.
Will Sega do that?
I don't think so. Sega have lost a ton of money in the home market since going third party, we all expected them to kick the hell out of the competition and they didn't.
They'd also have to take one heck of a loss early on to send people home with Naomi 2 based systems and the games would cost an arm and a leg pushing away all but the most dedicated gamers. Both of which are no good if you're trying to prove you can be a mass market contender.
If I'm Sammy and I make most of my money out of cheap gambling machines and those crappy mechanical "hook a prize systems", I'm pulling Sega out of the home aside from a couple of quick ports of arcade hits a year, and they are not getting back in there for love nor money.
Life is long and anything can happen in the games industry, but we should be prepared to accept that the DC was Sega's final bite at the home console cherry.
Comment