Brothers in Arms OR Call of Duty OR Medal of Honor? For PSP?

[SuperDanX]

Fancy a WW2 game for my PSP, anyone played these? Maybe recommend one? Cheers

[anephric]

I'm sure someone who's forced themselves to play all three will be along in minute, but I'm not given to FPSes on PSP in general, and MoH's utterly bodgetastic controls underlined this to me in a thick black line.

Utterly horrible to control.

[MattyD]

Brothers in Arms is more tactical. It's basically a first-person squad game. I liked the original two, A LOT, and the PSP version got good reviews, but be warned - they are extremely difficult if you don't approach them with the right mindset and certainly not blast-a-thons.

If you prefer something more arcadey, running around blasting etc etc then go for one of the other two. Not much of a choice TBH as my opinion of both franchises is pretty low. I would say CoD was probably the lesser of two evils though.

[egparadigm]

Brothers in Arms is more tactical. It's basically a first-person squad game. I liked the original two, A LOT, and the PSP version got good reviews, but be warned - they are extremely difficult if you don't approach them with the right mindset and certainly not blast-a-thons.

This is pretty much spot on. BIA is a totally different kind of game. I spent ages dying until I realised you had to use suppressing fire. I played Earned in Blood. It was a good game for what it was (tactical) and showed a very different side to the FPS, compared with most.

[SuperDanX]

Yeah cheers guys, ive played BiA on PS2 before, so im aware that is not a straight forwards fps. Im also aware that the psp isnt ideal for fps but hey! Having looked into it a bit Moh seems to have got pretty decent reviews (leaving aside control issues which all 3 were critised for) followed by CoD and BiA bringing up the rear (pretty shoddy and not a patch on the home versions apparently) thanks anyway chaps