To say the least, I'm angry...to say the most, I'm about 20 minutes from cancelling and telling them to go f*ck themselves.
For the past 3/4 days our Sky+HD (Oooh aren't we fancy...well yes, but we pay a fortune for that fanciness) has been going nuts, picture glitching/scrambling and with it the sound clicking, glitching, spotting etc.
It started with the HD channels and Channel 5 but I finally rang them today as the picture just went full stop, went through the usual nonsense about turning on/off and the like (would you believe the gentlemen I spoke to first actually told me to take out the cable connecting to the TV (in my case HDMI) and "tap it please sir"? Seriously? Get to f*ckery), nothing, I said I'd have a think and ring back later.
Rang back and went through more tests with a very helpful woman, tried everything, but nope, no joy, still unwatchable. £65 for the fix, and I don't object to that price as it's a cover all...HOWEVER...I object to the TWO WEEK wait for that engineer to come out! That, mind you, paled into insignificance when, upon enquiring, I was told that despite having poor picture for a week and now NO picture for 2 weeks, I would still have to pay the FULL months subscription fee.
Disgusted...angry...yup, outraged...definitely. I've been a Sky customer for over 10 years now, I've endured all the "HEY NEW CUSTOMERS WE'LL TREAT YOU BETTER THAN OUR LOYAL DECADE LONG CUSTOMERS" bull**** with good grace yet this...this is just too much.
How DARE they charge me for a service I'm not recieving? I'm not expecting a full refend on that month, but hey...even half price or even just drop the HD part of the price off for a month...but this is disgusting. How can they legally do this? They could, I suppose, claim that I might be lying about having no picture, but why, prey, would I then pay a £65 fee for an engineer appointment?
Has anyone experienced this utter nonsense before, and successfully recieved any form of compensation?
What really gets my goat though is that I'm not eligable for a subscription refund because my box is out of warranty. What difference does that make to the fact that the box THEY supplied doesn't work and I have no service?
I'm seething truth be told and as I say, I'm 20 minutes from cancelling...like they'd care.
For the past 3/4 days our Sky+HD (Oooh aren't we fancy...well yes, but we pay a fortune for that fanciness) has been going nuts, picture glitching/scrambling and with it the sound clicking, glitching, spotting etc.
It started with the HD channels and Channel 5 but I finally rang them today as the picture just went full stop, went through the usual nonsense about turning on/off and the like (would you believe the gentlemen I spoke to first actually told me to take out the cable connecting to the TV (in my case HDMI) and "tap it please sir"? Seriously? Get to f*ckery), nothing, I said I'd have a think and ring back later.
Rang back and went through more tests with a very helpful woman, tried everything, but nope, no joy, still unwatchable. £65 for the fix, and I don't object to that price as it's a cover all...HOWEVER...I object to the TWO WEEK wait for that engineer to come out! That, mind you, paled into insignificance when, upon enquiring, I was told that despite having poor picture for a week and now NO picture for 2 weeks, I would still have to pay the FULL months subscription fee.
Disgusted...angry...yup, outraged...definitely. I've been a Sky customer for over 10 years now, I've endured all the "HEY NEW CUSTOMERS WE'LL TREAT YOU BETTER THAN OUR LOYAL DECADE LONG CUSTOMERS" bull**** with good grace yet this...this is just too much.
How DARE they charge me for a service I'm not recieving? I'm not expecting a full refend on that month, but hey...even half price or even just drop the HD part of the price off for a month...but this is disgusting. How can they legally do this? They could, I suppose, claim that I might be lying about having no picture, but why, prey, would I then pay a £65 fee for an engineer appointment?
Has anyone experienced this utter nonsense before, and successfully recieved any form of compensation?
What really gets my goat though is that I'm not eligable for a subscription refund because my box is out of warranty. What difference does that make to the fact that the box THEY supplied doesn't work and I have no service?
I'm seething truth be told and as I say, I'm 20 minutes from cancelling...like they'd care.
Comment