Originally posted by Neon Ignition
View Post
I know that people knock it, and it's obvious to see why. There's a trend where people argue that Sonic sometimes just borrows concepts from Mario, but does them worse - and not only is Sonic Shuffle arguably the moment people started to say this, it's also probably still the most egregious example; because it's a Mario Party game, with precious little attempt to conceal that. I think it's even by some of the Mario Party developers.
But as anyone here will hopefully agree, sometimes you don't judge a game by some kind of objective measure of quality, but rather by the fun you had with it. This came along during a time when I had housemates and between us, four Dreamcast pads, and consequently, we had an absolute blast with this game.
And that criteria helps it, honestly, because so much of it was jank as hell. I seem to remember that one of the "outcome" type places on the board played these weird story scenes, where it was transparent something was meant to happen, but the game was clearly rushed and they weren't implemented, so they jammed in some filler content instead.
But still, a knock-off Mario Party is better than no Mario Party, and with three friends and some beers, I insist that Sonic Shuffle is a great time, sometimes because of and sometimes in spite of its faults.
Leave a comment: