I know that Hasanhadi already brought it up, and I know that you mods will almost certainly lock this thread up much, much sooner rather than later, but...
I've already read your reasons for locking the signature function in Hasanhadi's thread, and I appreciate them fully (really I do). But, I still think (like most of the others) that it sucks something rotten that the vast majority get punished in a way for the ****-ups of the idiotic minority. Surely you guys can find it within yourselves to reinstate the signature function with stricter reigns ie. 'Zero Tolerance'-style instant banning for those who abuse the function from the forum altogether?
I mean (without wanting to sound pithy about it), you guys have lock-deleted threads and banned users from this forum outright for seemingly lesser offences...
I've already read your reasons for locking the signature function in Hasanhadi's thread, and I appreciate them fully (really I do). But, I still think (like most of the others) that it sucks something rotten that the vast majority get punished in a way for the ****-ups of the idiotic minority. Surely you guys can find it within yourselves to reinstate the signature function with stricter reigns ie. 'Zero Tolerance'-style instant banning for those who abuse the function from the forum altogether?
I mean (without wanting to sound pithy about it), you guys have lock-deleted threads and banned users from this forum outright for seemingly lesser offences...
Comment