Here's an interesting stat - Oxford's combined vote: LD: 41087 Con: 33633 Lab: 27937. One Con MP, one Lab MP.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The Election
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by merf View Postproportional rep is all well and good but it leaves you with a permanent power share situation and the manifestoes that people voted for get watered down and never implemented (not that I spose they do anyway in current system)
With PR we would get a government that ruled by consensus and reached a compromise between the views of the majority, rather than the tin pot dictatorship we live in currently. It would give representation to all people and all views, and not just those who live in marginal constituencies or live near like-minded people.
Read the guide from the Electoral Reform Society and you'll soon understand that most of the drawbacks have been hugely over-blown by conservatives. Nearly all countries work this way now, Ireland moved to STV and every time the politicians have tried to switch back because of all the inconvenience, the people have denied them power.
Last edited by egparadigm; 07-05-2010, 14:33.
Comment
-
Watching the events last night every single MP and ex-MP stated they didn't beleive the polls and they were basically rubbish.
Hmmmm.
Exit poll at 11PM :
Con: 305; Lab: 255; Lib: 61; Other: 29
State of play as at now (15:48)
Con: 307; Lab: 258; Lib: 57; Other: 28
These are the people we are supposed to trust with their judgement. Oh dear.
Comment
-
Originally posted by charlesr View PostSurely time for internet voting? If I can fill out my tax form and do my banking online, surely I can vote online too?
Obviously you'd keep postal voting and polling stations for the oldies. Well, maybe even scrap polling stations.
No MRLP candidate in my area unfortunately.
Comment
-
I think more should be done to make internet voting a reality, although it is clear that anything other than the usual polling is a fraud risk. There are already complaints in some areas about the postal ballot.
I think it's almost more important that every person eligible to vote is registered to do so on election day. When I was telling yesterday there were two people who were unable to vote. In some countries registration is more or less 100%. We can do better.
Comment
-
Originally posted by charlesr View Posthttp://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/election2010/results/ Map view is madness. Who decided on all those tiny seats up North? It's a sea of blue and yet no win. lol, the whole thing is lame.
EDIT:
...Bob Peck, a Conservative councillor in Great Yarmouth. When he and Labour rival Charlie Marsden were tied on 1,034 votes each in his Yarmouth North ward, a returning officer settled the stalemate asking each to draw cards from a pack. Mr Peck lost his seat.Last edited by JP; 07-05-2010, 20:10.
Comment
-
Thought HamFaced Threepio's idea about PR within FPTP yesterday was extraordinarily bad and missed the point entirely. He basically said they'd look into making every constituency the same size and have FPTP within them. But that still means there'll be millions of wasted votes, the very thing people get pissed off about!
To illustrate:
Just say every constituency has 50,000 voters.
Constituency A
LAB 20,000
Con 15,000
LD 10,000
Others 5,000
LAB win
Constituency B
LAB 5,000
Con 22,000
LD 20,000
Others 3,000
Con Win
Constituency C
LAB 19,000
Con 8,000
LD 17,000
Others 6,000
LAB Win
Party /Total Votes/ Seats
LAB / 44,000/ 2
Con / 45,000/ 1
LD /47,000/ 0
Others /14,000/ 0
Daft idea.
Comment
-
Took part in a demo for proportional representation yesterday. Seemed to spend most of my time photographing the media and other photographers.
We started off with a formal rally and then marched down to Whitehall where we chanted until Nick Clegg was eventually forced to come out and address us.
Here are some of my faves and the rest via the link:
Couple BBC News spots from the demo:
It was also featured on Newsnight and hit the headlines and broadsheets.Last edited by egparadigm; 09-05-2010, 14:09.
Comment
Comment