Playstation 4: Thread 02

[Neon Ignition]

Worth mentioning, the PS+ Buy 1 year get 3 months free deal is on the store. I'm now set till end of September 2016

[fishbowlhead]

The Last Gardian is back on, yippee . However, puppeteer and nack have to be finished first before dev can continue properly. So, would suggest that it's been moved to ps4.

[25.05.2005]

Worth mentioning, the PS+ Buy 1 year get 3 months free deal is on the store. I'm now set till end of September 2016

This offer is still on too:

http://www.nowtv.com/promo/ps3?referrer=ps3offer&DCMP=erd_july13_NowTV_PSplusoffer__1

I've got 1 year free PS+ from it.

[85 78 73 81 85 69]

Couldn't find a thread for the game.

We plan to continue support for the title (Killzone Shadowfall) well after launch - and yes, DLC multiplayer maps will be released free of charge to ensure everyone can play.

This makes far too much sense.

I'm quite liking the look of the UI, hopefully it's just as smooth in real life. It looks like the touch pad was being used for typing.




Guerrilla have also announced that they are expecting the multiplayer part of Shadowfall to be 60fps by launch. They're keeping the single player section at 30fps.

[wakka]

Lol 30 fps FFS.

The most ridiculous thing is that Knack is 30 fps, and it's designed by the same bloke who made the console. How is that possible?!

[GluedOnBeard]

Lol 30 fps FFS.

The most ridiculous thing is that Knack is 30 fps, and it's designed by the same bloke who made the console. How is that possible?!

60 FPS for multiplayer though which just means it's early days for the console and some of the effects used in SP are yet to be harnessed efficiently, nothing wrong with that for a launch game.

As for Knack has the development time even been mentioned for it, why do you even need 60 fps for a game like that anyway?

[fishbowlhead]

Lol 30 fps FFS.

The most ridiculous thing is that Knack is 30 fps, and it's designed by the same bloke who made the console. How is that possible?!

If the game turns out to be fun to play who cares?

[wakka]

When I'm dropping 400 notes, me.

At launch the graphical difference between current gen and the last is going to be extremely slight, amplified by most of the games being cross-gen. If they at least locked 60fps for these new games that would at least provide a marked difference to the sub 30fps we've had in 99% of games this gen.

Not to mention the fact that these games aren't graphically pushing the system at all so the least we can really expect is some kind of optimisation. AND the fact that when we're talking Killzone and Knack, these are Sony games. Sony designed the hardware. They should at least be nailing the basics imo.

You never need 60fps GluedOnBeard. It just looks significantly better every time.

[fishbowlhead]

When I'm dropping 400 notes, me.

At launch the graphical difference between current gen and the last is going to be extremely slight, amplified by most of the games being cross-gen. If they at least locked 60fps for these new games that would at least provide a marked difference to the sub 30fps we've had in 99% of games this gen.

Not to mention the fact that these games aren't graphically pushing the system at all so the least we can really expect is some kind of optimisation. AND the fact that when we're talking Killzone and Knack, these are Sony games. Sony designed the hardware. They should at least be nailing the basics imo.

You never need 60fps GluedOnBeard. It just looks significantly better every time.

Same old argument, so very tired of seeing it posted generation after generation. Its not going to happen, at least not on the first wave of games, so just build a bridge and get over it. If its that much of a massive problem build a top end pc and just play on that.

[J0e Musashi]

generation after generation.

Exactly. They should have cracked it by now.

[wakka]

Nothing wrong with demanding more fishbowlhead. I will continue to complain about 30fps on ?350 hardware for as long as I wish. They should sort it out. I refuse to believe that that is impossible.

[fishbowlhead]

Nothing wrong with demanding more fishbowlhead. I will continue to complain about 30fps on ?350 hardware for as long as I wish. They should sort it out. I refuse to believe that that is impossible.

Phone up Sony and find out? no on on this forum has an answer for that question, nor has ever had one on here.

Although its more likely, as has probably always been the case, that adding more detail, physics and fidelity is more important than locking at 60fps in order to better differentiate the generations.

[wakka]

Eh? What question?

[teddymeow]

I'd rather have more bombast and prettiness locked at 30FPS than a more basic looking game running at 60FPS.

[darkangel]

Also, it's not just about the games your dropping that sort of money for, when I have a PS4 I would expect it to also be able to have bigger improvements on things like media services and fluidity of online connectivity, watching that video of the UI, especially the part of being able to watch an online game taking place from the UI and being able to drop in and out of the game without any major disruptions, is, in my view - what a huge part of next generation gaming is all about and that is one of the major reasons why I am going next gen.