GameCentral (or Game-something, I can never remember what) is much, much better than Digitiser ever was. Yes, they can be jaded. But so am I (incredibly so at the moment, I don't even want to buy VJ or F-Zero).
They got the balance of humour and fact just right. Only one time did they mess up when they reviewed a non-existent game for an April Fool. And they learnt their lesson.
Digi never got the balance right. Most of the time it was impossible to guess what was real and what was a joke story in the final months of Digi's life (hey I read it early in the morning, not the best time for deciding what seems plausible or not). Yes it was funny, but it had little to do with gaming.
Admittedly, they can be a little slow now and then with their previews. But since they have no capacity for images, they can't preview something until they have some decent content on the thing. If Mr. Mott is behind it, I say:
"Well done Mr. Mott"
Can't wait for you to kick EDGE out of it's painfully long downward slide. GameCentral may be jaded, but they are rarely negative in the manner that EDGE are (you know in their writing. Take the Ninja Gaiden preview in a previous issue.) And their reviews are generally informative (better than GamesTM even) and much more focused (IMO) on the game rather than some nebulous "style" that the game possesses. After all, they ain't art, they're ?40 products that you use for fun. Not some life-enhancing experience.
I have one reservation. On a letters page GameCentral recently professed their love or admiration or respect for EA. This has me worried. EDGE have already shown themselves to be fans of EA. There is currently a movement in the "serious" gaming circles that EA have suddenly got their act together and are producing decent games.
Not that this is a necessarily bad movement or wrong or whatever, but EA have yet to convince me. It is natural not to want to read a magazine that covers products you have no interest in. I have no interest in EA. And certainly not in-depth features. Still, at least that issue wasn't as bad as the Minter one. At least EA tend to have some hope of releasing a game within a reasonable time.
Interesting to note that EDGE weren't impressed with quite a few of the EA products they covered either. Seems slightly odd.
I just hope EDGE doesn't waste any more of it's time under Mr. Mott talking about EA products. I'd buy other mags if I wanted this. I'm sure TW2003 lovers will disagree. And they are more than welcome to.
I have a sneaking suspicion that, like my love of Phantom Crash and SMS, I am in the minority...
They got the balance of humour and fact just right. Only one time did they mess up when they reviewed a non-existent game for an April Fool. And they learnt their lesson.
Digi never got the balance right. Most of the time it was impossible to guess what was real and what was a joke story in the final months of Digi's life (hey I read it early in the morning, not the best time for deciding what seems plausible or not). Yes it was funny, but it had little to do with gaming.
Admittedly, they can be a little slow now and then with their previews. But since they have no capacity for images, they can't preview something until they have some decent content on the thing. If Mr. Mott is behind it, I say:
"Well done Mr. Mott"
Can't wait for you to kick EDGE out of it's painfully long downward slide. GameCentral may be jaded, but they are rarely negative in the manner that EDGE are (you know in their writing. Take the Ninja Gaiden preview in a previous issue.) And their reviews are generally informative (better than GamesTM even) and much more focused (IMO) on the game rather than some nebulous "style" that the game possesses. After all, they ain't art, they're ?40 products that you use for fun. Not some life-enhancing experience.
I have one reservation. On a letters page GameCentral recently professed their love or admiration or respect for EA. This has me worried. EDGE have already shown themselves to be fans of EA. There is currently a movement in the "serious" gaming circles that EA have suddenly got their act together and are producing decent games.
Not that this is a necessarily bad movement or wrong or whatever, but EA have yet to convince me. It is natural not to want to read a magazine that covers products you have no interest in. I have no interest in EA. And certainly not in-depth features. Still, at least that issue wasn't as bad as the Minter one. At least EA tend to have some hope of releasing a game within a reasonable time.
Interesting to note that EDGE weren't impressed with quite a few of the EA products they covered either. Seems slightly odd.
I just hope EDGE doesn't waste any more of it's time under Mr. Mott talking about EA products. I'd buy other mags if I wanted this. I'm sure TW2003 lovers will disagree. And they are more than welcome to.
I have a sneaking suspicion that, like my love of Phantom Crash and SMS, I am in the minority...
Comment