-----
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Consoles reaching their full potential late in their life cycle...
Collapse
X
-
For me no machine was pushed more than the Neo Geo. Games like Garou: MotW and Metal Slug 3 look almost two generations apart from the likes of Fatal Fury and Art of Fighting. The fact that the Playstation couldn't replicate perfect ports of later Neo Geo games and that we had to wait for the Dreamcast and PS2 to be released for near-perfect ports is testament to just how far SNK pushed the machine.
-
Originally posted by HC_O View Post
To use a 'Super FX 2' equipped SNES/SFC game as an example (like the Neo-Geo) the 2D power was more than a enough to match the next 32 bit generation such as the Saturn or PS1.
It all came down to price. Rom prices were already high. You had devs upping the MBs, but.. the SFX must have been too expensive. SETA did develop their own chip for ExhaustHeat2, which helped the 3D look of the game.
Yoshi's is definitely a great looking game - with some excellent effects. MarioWorld was never a graphical showcase, though, and it was only 4mb, so Yoshi's could have been done without the SFX; minus some of the effects. The actual look of the game would work without extra power.
You can only imagine an Axelay2 with the SFX2. The bosses and environment effects could have been mind-blowing.
It is true that you get devs pushing machines near the end of their life. I wouldn't say it's as simple as that, though, because most of the best games are made in the 2nd wave of titles.
ThunderforceIV on the MD definitely shows how a dev can push a machine, compared to previous games in the series.
Samanosuke is right to choose Garou. The difference in quality between that and the first games like Fatal Fury & Art of Fighting, is amazing. Garou is on another level - and it's not just because the cartridge size is huge.
When it comes to the SNES, I think early games like ContraIII, Castlevania, are the best examples of what the machine can do. Konami showed that most SNES devs were very bad at that job.Last edited by Leon Retro; 15-09-2009, 18:20.
Comment
-
Good topic. When you look at stuff like God of War 2, and Tekken 5 on the PS2 then you can appreciate how much a machine can be pushed later in it's life.
It's a real shame the first Xbox was killed so abruptly, as it was a cracking machine, and I'm sure it would have been pushed even further than the PS2 given half a chance. Look at Ninja Gaiden on it, and imagine what they could have done had they revisited it three years later.
Comment
-
Originally posted by samanosuke View PostFor me no machine was pushed more than the Neo Geo. Games like Garou: MotW and Metal Slug 3 look almost two generations apart from the likes of Fatal Fury and Art of Fighting. The fact that the Playstation couldn't replicate perfect ports of later Neo Geo games and that we had to wait for the Dreamcast and PS2 to be released for near-perfect ports is testament to just how far SNK pushed the machine.
To use a 'Super FX 2' equipped SNES/SFC game as an example (like the Neo-Geo) the 2D power was more than a enough to match the next 32 bit generation such as the Saturn or PS1.
I think the Mega Drive was one of the machine pushed to it's limited and more so . So of the latter MD games , were doing insane tricks with no extra hardware inthe carts or Massive carts .
Adv Of Batman &Robin , Yu Yu Hakusho featured perfect multiple sprite rotation and scaling respectively , and while the game might have been pants Vectorman did some amazing tricks
Comment
-
Originally posted by Team Andromeda View PostTo me most of what the Super Fx did in Yoshi (and I'm sure it was just using Super FX 1 chip) was what the Snes could have done , if NCL had given it a decent CPU from the start
Comment
-
Originally posted by HC_O View PostTo use a 'Super FX 2' equipped SNES/SFC game as an example (like the Neo-Geo) the 2D power was more than a enough to match the next 32 bit generation such as the Saturn or PS1.
Yakumo
Comment
-
Originally posted by Grapple Convoy View PostTrue. Always depressing thinking back to the Super Famicom/Super NES, how much more awesome it'd have been with a decent CPU. I may be misremembering facts, but I recall that the crap processor was to enable some kind of backwards compatibility with the Famicom, which as we know was never a feature of the final hardware.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Team Andromeda View PostI think the Mega Drive was one of the machine pushed to it's limited and more so . So of the latter MD games , were doing insane tricks with no extra hardware inthe carts or Massive carts .
I'd probably include Ranger-X/Ex-Ranza as well, it was incredible looking, you'd be forgiven for thinking it was running on a Snes, I think that was mid 1993 though, so not sure if it counts as a title late in the Megadrives life cycle.
Comment
-
Interesting topic............ but wasn't Halo menat to have pushed the cock box i mean xbox near enough to the max when it came out? If that was true then the xbox was near enough maxed out from the get go......
Perhaps its takes a number of years for programmers to develop the appropriate tools to best utilise a console, kinda like trial and error........ It might also be due to the fact that, when you have a console still very much in its prime, and you need a new way to sustain interest, so you tag on bits and prieces so that you can do new tricks, which ooo and ahhh the fan base and potential new adopters........
I dunno, but i tend to find that when a successor is announced and the existing console is on its way out, peeps tend to become nostalgic about letting go......... I know i did with my DC and pretty much every other console.......
112
Comment
-
Originally posted by 112 View PostInteresting topic............ but wasn't Halo menat to have pushed the cock box i mean xbox near enough to the max when it came out? If that was true then the xbox was near enough maxed out from the get go......
Comment
Comment