Originally posted by Brats
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The Tennis Thread
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by Number45 View PostFederer has had to adapt his game recently due to the opposition, but when he emerged he was very much a classic serve and volley player. You could argue Sampras wasn't a classic serve and volley style because he was capable of dominating from the baseline - each player had/has a very strong all round game and use what is necessary.
I'm not quite convinced on Djokovic yet. Undoubtedly an awesome player who is always getting better, but I still feel he falls short of the other two at the height of their game.
Have to disagree about Djokovic. He is definitely up there with Nadal and Federer - until recently, he was on course to replace Nadal as the world #2 in the rankings. On a hard court, I'd probably take an in-form Djokovic over an in-form Nadal as the Spaniard's game isn't so effective on the faster-playing hard courts: he hasn't been past the last eight at the US Open, Jo-Wilfried Tsonga (another talent for the future) battered him in the Aussie Open semi-final earlier this year and quite a few other players like James Blake have winning head-to-head records against Nadal on hard courts.
Like a lot of others, I do feel that Murray's best chance of major success will probably come at either the US Open or the Aussie Open.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Nu-Eclipse View PostGreat point. Pete Sampras was actually a baseline-type player as a junior, only changing his style to serve and volley in the very early years of his pro career. I always feel that his play on the baseline never really got the credit that it deserved, but that was probably down to his serve and volley game being probably the best that Men's Tennis has ever seen.
Have to disagree about Djokovic. He is definitely up there with Nadal and Federer - until recently, he was on course to replace Nadal as the world #2 in the rankings. On a hard court, I'd probably take an in-form Djokovic over an in-form Nadal as the Spaniard's game isn't so effective on the faster-playing hard courts: he hasn't been past the last eight at the US Open, Jo-Wilfried Tsonga (another talent for the future) battered him in the Aussie Open semi-final earlier this year and quite a few other players like James Blake have winning head-to-head records against Nadal on hard courts.
Like a lot of others, I do feel that Murray's best chance of major success will probably come at either the US Open or the Aussie Open.
From what I remember Becker, Stich Sampras, Rafter, Kraijeck and Ivanisevic all retired within a few years of each other and there haven't been serve and volley specialists at the top of the game since.
Comment
-
During the Serena vs Jie (damn shes nice) match, the camera often cut to Serenas dad for the ol reaction pic etc, anyway couldnt help notice that he was blatently decked out with Stargate Worlds apparel, baseball cap, jumper etc. Strange i thought.
Well worked with me anyway i checked their website after the match..
Comment
-
Originally posted by Shoju View PostGonzalez also thrashed Nadal at last year's Australian Open. He's dominant on clay and is getting better and better on grass but has still yet to make an impact on the hard courts. Has he even made the quarters at the Aus or US opens yet?Last edited by Nu-Eclipse; 04-07-2008, 06:52.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Largo View PostDuring the Serena (damn shes nice) vs Jie match, the camera often cut to Serenas dad for the ol reaction pic etc, anyway couldnt help notice that he was blatently decked out with Stargate Worlds apparel, baseball cap, jumper etc. Strange i thought.
Well worked with me anyway i checked their website after the match..
Comment
Comment