Originally posted by Dogg Thang
View Post
There are certainly things for which AI is going to change everything, irrevocably, forever (short of a regression in human progress). A very good example is the one you've listed; language translation and localisation. We're already seeing that; the share price for some of the bigger localisation firms has taken an absolute nose-dive in the last 12 months. I have massive sympathy for anyone who works as a localiser; it was already a low-paying job, but now, with AI, if you want to localise, say, manga, before, where you needed an office of 10 professionals, now you probably just need 8 competent operators for the AI and 2 people to fix where it screws up.
But that's a specific example of the absolute best use-case.
Secondly, yes, what I'm saying is based on the current state of AI; but the sort of "functional understanding" you're suggesting is a real leap over where we are now; it's arguable the present AI just climbed over the garden fence while that sort of understanding is Everest. I strongly suspect it'll get there but it's not going to happen at the same pace.
I just think people have an inflated expectation of some of this stuff, and they have it because people want to sell that technology, sell shares in those businesses, just like the DotCom wave, or the Crypto wave, or the NFT wave. AI is admittedly closer to Web2.0, insofar as unlike NFTs it does have a use that's easy to explain, but I still think it's being exaggerated.
It's going to change things. But Photoshop changed things. It didn't destroy the media industry. I just think AI's really far from that point.
EDIT: BTW [MENTION=3144]Dogg Thang[/MENTION], I'm not trying to tell you you're wrong, or anything like that. I think we've both looked at these tools a great deal as they've matured. I think we've just reached different conclusions. I totally respect your concerns; I mean, those are why I looked into it in the first place!
Comment