Originally posted by nonny
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Xbox Series S/X: Thread 02
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Originally posted by nonny View PostWell I guess we will see in the real world when they're available in the real world.
You're right in that the internals of the Series S are very similar to the Series X but on paper the X is 3x more powerful but then it has to be to push to the resolution it's aiming for at the same frame rate.
It's like saying Doom Eternal is the same in the real world on two PC running on different GPU cards one at 1440p60 and one that can achieve 4K120... Yeah it's the same game, and on your TV upscaled the lower powered unit might be all you need... But there's a clear difference in power to hit the higher benchmark.
I'm sure it's absolutely accurate in terms of the numbers, I just don't think those numbers are especially meaningful for most of us.
EDIT: In terms of the chat above as to whether 1080p is identifiably worse than 4K on a 'normal' size (~50 to 60 inch) TV set - I reckon you sit pretty far back Dave. 14 foot is a decent distance, I'm probably only about 7 feet away.
I mostly play on a One S so most stuff is probably rendering at 900p. It looks pretty nice to be honest, but soft. I am hoping for a decent uplift in sharpness when I get my PS5, although I'm not expecting it to be too earth shattering.Last edited by wakka; 14-09-2020, 15:52.
Comment
-
I think if you're playing 1080p (or 900p) right now and you don't mind going digital and 4K doesn't bother you then yep the Series S is a steal.
If you do plan to get a 4K TV in the near future though then I would say the extra £200 for the series X (or PS5 when we know the cost) is worth it as well.
Comment
-
Originally posted by wakka View PostEDIT: In terms of the chat above as to whether 1080p is identifiably worse than 4K on a 'normal' size (~50 to 60 inch) TV set - I reckon you sit pretty far back Dave. 14 foot is a decent distance, I'm probably only about 7 feet away.
Irrespective of the resolution frame rates must come first. I'd much rather play at 4K/120FPS than 8K/60FPS.
For most people there will be no going back to 60 after they've tasted 120. Especially on large screens playing fast games.Last edited by dataDave; 14-09-2020, 16:04.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Brad View PostIt’s simple. Getting the series S is like buying a new gpu, for more money than you paid for the last one but it’s slower and has less ram.
A next generation console with just 4 teraflops of GPU power? Well, that's the rumour. While Microsoft teases and tempt…
The S is really very cheap for that level of CPU, GPU, RAM and SSD.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Brad View PostIt’s simple. Getting the series S is like buying a new gpu, for more money than you paid for the last one but it’s slower and has less ram.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dogg Thang View PostOkay but, if you put aside resolution which I know is a core difference, is the Series S still a significant upgrade over the One X? I know it’s not in res but, if both were displayed on regular HD televisions, would it be an upgrade?
The real test is going to be when the next-gen patch for Cyberpunk 2077 hits. The One X will trump it on the resolution, but likely not on anything else.
The One X and the Series X have one major bragging right between them, and that is "NATIVE 4K!!".
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dogg Thang View PostOkay but, if you put aside resolution which I know is a core difference, is the Series S still a significant upgrade over the One X? I know it’s not in res but, if both were displayed on regular HD televisions, would it be an upgrade?
Comment
Comment