Originally posted by crazytaxinext
View Post
I personally think it worked as well as it did because it didn't try to be something other than what it is, 90 odd minutes of Sci-Fi nonsense. And it was a crap load better than Spielberg's take on War of the Worlds, something which could have been amazing if he'd stuck to the original story in the correct time period. (When I first found out he'd taken it on, I really thought we may see the cold horror of the original story with the look and feel of Saving Private Ryan, though, the 13 minute build up to the reveal of the first Tripod and initial attack sequence I thought was nigh on perfect, after that you can pretty much turn it off).
I love my Sci-Fi & my special effects, (practical & CGI, which I trained in but never got that break into the industry... sigh...), and found that Skyline did serve up some fantastic effects work, a couple of sequences which spring to mind were artistically and cinematically truly beautifully and stunning.
So, if anyone's curious, don't take it too seriously, it's not trying to change the world of Sci-Fi cinema or re-write the rules and it sure as hell won't be the worst film you've seen... maybe!
Back to Topic... Green Zone... What did that quote say on the poster? 'Bourne goes Epic?' Erm, I think you mean Bourne goes Boring... really boring... and badly directed... with awful, truly awful action sequences. I'd quite happily slap the cinematographer of that film and also shake the hand of the person who cut the trailer together for managing to cheat so many people out of their money by advertising a completely different film... Sod...
Comment