Originally posted by rmoxon
View Post
Take the LOTR trilogy as a perfect example, lots of people moaned at the fact that extended versions appeared after the theatrical versions but there is no way the majority of people would have been able to watch the extended version of the films at the cinema. I actually can't watch the standard versions of those films anymore, there is just too much missing.
It comes down to making sure a runtime of a film isn't overly long so that people don't have to get up half way through to go to the loo. So it makes perfect sense to me to have extended versions of films afterwards that people can watch at their own leasure.
And it's not like every film has a extra cut a few months after the bluray / dvd release. The majority of films that have been released in the last few years (A-Team, Green Lantern etc) have all had slightly longer versions out as soon as home release is available, so I don't see it as cynical in any way myself.
I suspect there will be an extended cut of this film though at some point though, there did seem like there were some major gaps in the story.
Back on topic though, I thought it was an ok movie if unspectacular. The 'Vision' of the film is very good and I do like the ideas that come about from it, even though you could see most of them coming a mile off. My main gripe was that most the actors were just there to be killed off one way or the other, and then thats it. It was a bit sloppy in that regard.
Saying that there is the one 'scene' which had me covering my eyes at one point I must admit. I'm not squimish in any way but the way it was shot and done was quite unnerving. Also Fassbender seems to turn everything he touches into gold, and was as good as Ian Holm was in Alien.
As with a lot of 'prequels' or 'remakes' or whatever though people expect too much. Obviously there was the pay off
, but otherwise this film stands apart in that particular universe..
Speaking of
then surely that creates a massive continiuty problem with
.
Comment