I'm not a huge fan of Nikon compact cameras, Canon and Fujifilm produce better ones imo. There doesn't seem to be a lot of reviews around for that particular model atm.
It seems it only came out March 31st so is rather new. They'll be selling off the L330 for $140 tomorrow so I could cover the whole thing with points...but I'm going to see what else they have I think.
Well I got the Nikon Coolpix L340, hoping they fixed some of the complaints about the L330. And it only cost me $41.49 after points so w/e.
Mainly for Japan next month (next week!?) as I can update photos of my old haunts. The lighting won't be an issue as it'll be 90% outside, and resizing should fix other picture issues. I'll still have my 14MP Canon compact to general carry around, and my Nexus 4 for random quick pics.
Yes! I would like to post more pictures here, although there's not much I'm going to be seeing any time soon.
You can get nice pics with any camera; where smaller sensor / compact cameras tend to be weaker is in low light situations and control of depth of field, possibly speed of focus. If these aren't a worry then I'm sure you'll get on fine with it.
I've been playing with my 105mm macro lens with the extension tubes added - you can get super close.
I seem to have dropped out of photography for some reason, but starting to get the urge again, and buying a new compact to go alongside my D90 - the LX100 has a few dials...
When we first saw the Panasonic Lumix LX100 we were impressed that the company had finally squeezed a large-size Micro Four Thirds sensor into a compact
I'm guessing that "macro" mode just opens up the aperture to blow the background out to create a sort of macro effect. Can you get any closer in than that?
Oh I wasn't saying you weren't using it right, was just wondering what kind of minimum distance that kind of camera offers compared to something like my Canon f1.4 50mm - which isn't a macro lens.
Comment