That is hideous! And back to glossy too, bad move...
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
PSthree
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by speedlolita View PostWhy can't Sony realise that nobody wants a console that you can't stack stuff on top of!
Edit:
On the last image, it looks like a part of the top cover is to be slid to the left manually, to put the disc in. Horrendously inelegant if that's the case.
And 16GB memory only? No MGS4 then.Last edited by JSR; 14-07-2012, 00:54.
Comment
-
Why can't Sony realise that nobody wants a console that you can't stack stuff on top of!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Alex WS View PostOn the last image, it looks like a part of the top cover is to be slid to the left manually, to put the disc in. Horrendously inelegant if that's the case.
Mind you the ps2 slim wasnt much better.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Alex WS View PostNo USB on back = lame-o.
I wouldn't really mind the design if there wasn't the corrugated and uneven part right int he centre of the console, though there are lot of details and uneven edges that scream prototype, maybe they'll change design a little after som many backlashes.
Comment
-
Ok, so this isn't totally accurate, but here's an initial comparison:
This only took a couple of minutes in Preview, so take it as it is....
Anyway, looks like the footprint is about the same, I can't imagine it's any less deep. The height is the only real noticeable difference.
As for the slide-top Blu-Ray drive, I think it's hideous and cheap. Sony used the same slide-top on the Bravia KDL-22PX300 TV/PS2 combo which looked terrible. They could have at least gone for a well designed pop-top that would have complimented the design. But try explaining to the finance dept why it's worth an extra 0.03? per unit to have a nicer looking drive cover.....
Comment
Comment