Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The Photography Thread
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Originally posted by winky View PostThe pro glass makes such a difference in terms of sharpness, contrast and colour.
Comment
-
Alastair, that's an excellent shot. Really good contrast with the original. Adam's wink is starkly sober in comarison with the Vietcong POW. Awesome location too.
Btw, I remember reading a story about the (original) photo. The officer performing the execution was apparently a relatively humane man, who felt compelled to execute the prisoner, as he'd be responsible for some very bad things (that escape my memory.) When the photo achieved fame, the officer was basically held up as an emblem of cruelty, and the infamy followed him for the rest of his life. The photographer felt so guilty about it that he was lamenting it until his death. Says some things about context, I think. I'm sure there's some concrete info a mere Google away.
Ampanman, the Nikon 70-200 2.8 VR is, from what I can see, a damn good equivalent for my Canon lens. But just go out and take photos anyway. The lens isn't nearly as important as what you point it at. It's just a piece of glass.
For a bit of perspective, these are shots by my flatmate, mostly taken on a pair of £20 and £30 digital cameras from Tescos. Check out the EXIF data: "Taken with a Camera." Lolz, but I think they're great photos.
Edit: Alastair, focus stacking is a bit like HDR. You take photos at various points of focus and then combine them all, so that you have a much greater depth of field than would be possible. It comes in handy for macro shots where you've got a really narrow DOF and you don't have the light to do an f/16 shot or the like.Last edited by Magnakai; 18-06-2008, 13:06.
Comment
-
Thanks for the explanation Mag. I have also heard the same story about the photo and neither can I remember where!
Lighting set-up used on the above shot:
EDIT:
Originally posted by WikipediaThe photo won Adams the 1969 Pulitzer Prize for Spot News Photography, though he was later said to have regretted the impact it had. The image became an anti-war icon. Concerning General Nguyễn and his famous photograph, Eddie Adams later wrote in Time:
“The general killed the Viet Cong; I killed the general with my camera. Still photographs are the most powerful weapon in the world. People believe them, but photographs do lie, even without manipulation. They are only half-truths...What the photograph didn't say was, 'What would you do if you were the general at that time and place on that hot day, and you caught the so-called bad guy after he blew away one, two or three American soldiers?”
Eddie Adams later apologized in person to General Nguyễn and his family for the damage it did to his reputation. When General Nguyễn died, Adams praised him as a hero of a just cause:
“The guy was a hero. America should be crying. I just hate to see him go this way, without people knowing anything about him.”
Comment
-
Originally posted by Alastair View Post
Yours is an interesting take on the image, poignant and thought provoking too.
You might want to show the original photo in your post above, although the link to it is on your Flickr page so perhaps you don't you need to worry
P.S. Is your set just lit by using a few speedlights and the overhead lights in the warehouse?Last edited by funkydan; 18-06-2008, 13:29.
Comment
-
Originally posted by funkydan View PostYou might want to show the original photo in your post above, although the link to it is on your Flickr page so perhaps you don't you need to worry
P.S. Is your set just lit by using a few speedlights and the overhead lights in the warehouse?
I'm a views whore so people can click
Regarding the lighting, what you see in the next shot (set-up) is it. What else did you think we might have used? The flashes lit the subjects and the long shutter (1/15) took in the ambient light. Hope that's clear'ish. EDIT: they weren't overhead 'lights' as the place is completely abandoned but windows in the roof, 'skylights'. Guess that may be what you meant though.Last edited by Alastair; 18-06-2008, 13:49.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Alastair View PostRegarding the lighting, what you see in the next shot (set-up) is it. What else did you think we might have used? The flashes lit the subjects and the long shutter (1/15) took in the ambient light. Hope that's clear'ish. EDIT: they weren't overhead 'lights' as the place is completely abandoned but windows in the roof, 'skylights'. Guess that may be what you meant though.
I'm really impressed mate as the image says so much. Send it to everyone and every on- and off-line photography publication and get it seen everywhere!
I am genuinely moved!
Just wondering if you had thought of perhaps converting it to b+w for added something-or-other? Authenticity perhaps or even more of an affiliation with the originalLast edited by funkydan; 18-06-2008, 14:07.
Comment
-
Originally posted by funkydan View PostI am genuinely moved!
Just wondering if you had thought of perhaps converting it to b+w for added something-or-other? Authenticity perhaps or even more of an affiliation with the original
I have been trying to do a BW conversion but just can't get it to sit right, maybe Ish should do it for me, he seems to be the master now.
Originally posted by Magnakai View PostActually, Alastair, you've just reminded me of a shot I had planned for the next couple of weeks. I think I might adapt it a bit now. You've given me some inspiration.too
Last edited by Alastair; 18-06-2008, 18:18.
Comment
-
Alastair - I love that. Great stuff. Very funny. I recognised the inspiration from your shot but you've put a great humourous riff on it.
Yup I'm a Nikon user - I was thinking of the Nikon equivelant. The slow speed of my current zoom I find very frustrating - but I wouldn't want to lug one of those beasts around all the time! And I don't know about being the B&W conversion master - I can't take that level of pressure
Comment
-
That's pretty cool Garf.
I feel pretty good today after all the nice comments and the community in this thread (and the beers). Interestingly, as of right now that shot has got 127 views, 65 are from flickr but tellingly 37 are from here, I've posted it on RLLMUK too and haven't had one comment and only 18 links through to the picture on Flickr, you guys really do rock
Got another Flickr Brighton meet tomorrow night, should be a good night as that's another great photo community I'm lucky to be a part of.
Comment
-
Al, I have looked at your picture a few times, and while technically sound I dont really like it. Not sure if its because it represents, and the slightly comical take you have produced. At the very least it has had me thinking and looking at it a few times, so amazing job there.
Hope you don't take my comments too harshly, the subject matter just doesn't sit comfortably with me.
PS focus stacking as described above is merging photographs with slightly different focus to create a composite image that it is in focus. thankfully there is a nice little programme that makes it free and easy: CombineZM
I am going fishing tomorrow night and I am also taking my camera, so I may get some shots. But with the camera bag and the stupid amount of fishing tackle I carry I doubt I will make it back without doing my back in! Don't mix hobbies, it will only end in tears
Comment
-
Originally posted by winky View PostAl, I have looked at your picture a few times, and while technically sound I dont really like it. Not sure if its because it represents, and the slightly comical take you have produced. At the very least it has had me thinking and looking at it a few times, so amazing job there.
Hope you don't take my comments too harshly, the subject matter just doesn't sit comfortably with me.
When I was emailing Adam about doing the shot I said to him that I wasn't sure as I thought it may be in poor taste. Regardless, we both thought it a good idea and 'art' should make people think, that's what it's all about for me. There is a point to it in that it's supposed to really obviously show the discomfort of being a subject of a camera, something I suffer from a lot myself, hence why I was the 'minor' character in this piece. It's not meant to be a literal execution but more of a person feeling trapped and nervous of being in front of the camera. Using such an iconic photo as inspiration. Had we used a gun instead of a super 8 camera I think it would have been too much.
I'm rambling, thanks for the comments though, it's good to hear everything, good and not so good.
Comment
Comment