Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Resident Evil 5 (PS3 / Xbox 360)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Anyone played this on Move yet? does it work or add anything interesting to the experience?

    Comment


      Still waiting for HMV to ship. Seems like everywhere is out of stock at the moment.

      Comment


        Doesn't work that amazingly, its very much RE5 Wii Edition but slightly more cumbersome as RE5 was more cumbersome to begin with. But when going back to controller I did miss the motion controls.

        The button QTE's just seem to be always placed on the Move button now (at least against Wesker in LiN, and the Lickers in Mercs), so they aren't annoying anymore.

        What you'll miss is strafing (never used it), and D-pad change.

        Comment


          The trouble seems to be that RE5 is more of an 3rd person shooter than a survival horror, and the move controls are akin to RE4 Wii, which WAS a survival horror game.

          You lose a lot of speed with move, it makes it a different game.

          Comment


            DS3>Move IMO. Especially on Professional, which is the only way to play.
            Kept you waiting, huh?

            Comment


              Originally posted by Jebus View Post
              The trouble seems to be that RE5 is more of an 3rd person shooter than a survival horror, and the move controls are akin to RE4 Wii, which WAS a survival horror game.

              You lose a lot of speed with move, it makes it a different game.
              How was Resi 4 more of a survival horror game than part 5?

              Both are action focused shooters that feature no puzzle solving and very little horror really. If anything there is more ammo laying around in RE 4 as well which makes it feel like the complete oposite of a survival horror game.

              Although I enjoy it RE5 is just designed poorly in comparison, which I imagine is the reason it dosent work so great with move. It felt like it was a game designed for speedier controls in the first place. RE4 is brilliantly designed, the gameplay is perfectly in tune with its control scheme, but its still an action game.
              Last edited by rmoxon; 22-09-2010, 15:53.

              Comment


                Originally posted by rmoxon View Post
                How was Resi 4 more of a survival horror game than part 5?
                For one thing, the latter had COVER BASED SHOOTING. And I personally feel that the first one (the fourth one) had much more atmospheric locations. It had Spooky Village, Haunted Castle and Arctic Research Base. While number 5 felt more like a trip to Universal Studios Theme Park (aztec caves, tribe marshlands and sci-fi elevator). Having a partner also made the survival aspect more subdued. The partner also required using more time in menus, organizing your items and whatnot, not exactly a horrific activity.

                Comment


                  I think the fact that 5 allows for infnite ammo and highly powerful weapons once they are upgraded turns it into an action shooter rather than survival horror. You can pretty much just stand in one place and fire at waves of enemies without reloading until they are all dead.
                  It's badass in co-op though on Professional difficulty with a good player.
                  Kept you waiting, huh?

                  Comment


                    There's WAAAAAYYYYY more ammo in 5 than 4!

                    Move allows easy headshots but the lack of strafing is a pain I find. The controls with Move never really feel right and even after 3 hours play I still get confused about which button does what.

                    Comment


                      I agree with the points you are both making; the locations are way too friendly / perhaps a little too exotic, the game is definitely action orientated as opposed to a truly scary atmospheric experience (hope they make this one day) but for what it is its quite entertaining in co-op. From what you guys are saying it seems that Move hasn't been delivered as well as it could have which is a shame but ironic given that this is what most people think of the game in general.

                      I feel that RE5 and Lost Planet 2 (never meant to be scary but the story & characters are whack!) were too concerned with delivering co-op experiences that they lost focus with the overall experience. At least they now have libraries to build upon when it comes to co-op but hopefully they will focus on making sure they have the right overall experience next time.

                      However I really don't believe the reason RE5 not being scary is due to the fact its co-op there really is no reason why a co-op game can't be atmospheric and scary.
                      Last edited by Morph; 22-09-2010, 16:32.

                      Comment


                        RE5's biggest problem is that I essentially HAVE to play it with someone else. Sheva's uselss. She wastes ammo on dead bodies and in those tunnels she just wedges the lantern into the back of my head and neither of us can see where we're going.

                        Comment


                          The biggest difference is that RE5 is a co-op game which means levels are being made completely linear much like Gears of War. Getting stuck on a puzzle or in a labyrinth in a co-op game is a no go. In RE4 you had to explore the whole maze like village, finding key items scattered all over the place and advance. Thats true RE. It was big, it was epic. RE4 is a complete masterpiece in my book. Its obvious that Capcom misses the likes of Mikami. That Inafune can whine what he want.

                          When playing Lost in Nightmares I realize how important the settings are. That Episode is really great imo. Still not on RE4 level, but much better than RE5. Desperate Escape is too, because it doesn't hold back like the main game does. The helipad scene feels like true survival. Both are also darker than RE5, daylight Africa settings do NOT work in RE. Although the very first trailer looked frightening (it also used the dropped sunlight thing that would mess up your view). The second trailer, the 'in game' one with the girl in the tube, had a MUCH bigger enemy count etc. When Sheva was announced it went downhill.

                          The El Giganto boss in RE5 illustrates the difference between RE4 and RE5. The first is an awesome fight, and the second is brainless crap.

                          Still, I've played RE5 for over 40 hours probably. And thats due to Mercs which is awesome in co-op, and I keep replaying the DLC Episodes.
                          Last edited by saturn-gamer; 22-09-2010, 16:52.

                          Comment


                            Originally posted by FullSpecWarrior View Post
                            RE5's biggest problem is that I essentially HAVE to play it with someone else. Sheva's uselss. She wastes ammo on dead bodies and in those tunnels she just wedges the lantern into the back of my head and neither of us can see where we're going.
                            Hahaha she is indeed quite useless as all co-op/multilayer AI (even Reach though to far lesser extent).

                            It obviously took some effort to even get Sheva working the way she currently isn't but I really don't understand why they even bothered - they should have just made her disappear for single player.

                            Comment


                              Originally posted by saturn-gamer View Post
                              The biggest difference is that RE5 is a co-op game which means levels are being made completely linear much like Gears of War. Getting stuck on a puzzle or in a labyrinth in a co-op game is a no go. In RE4 you had to explore the whole maze like village, finding key items scattered all over the place and advance. Thats true RE. It was big, it was epic...

                              You are right they force you to work together and be together all the time it would have been much more interesting if in co-op you both play different sets of objectives in the same world but as two separate entities if your both in the same area then you see each other and you can help each other out with each others objectives if you wish. A bit like RE2 you would have 2 perspectives to play through for single player and in co-op you'd be completely free to play through in the way you want to (co-op/semi co-op). Much harder to craft/put together but we really should be pushing boundaries with modern games.

                              Comment


                                Finally got around to playing some of this with the Move tonight (Only the first chapter, I've forgotten how to play the game. ). Left all of the controls at default, and aside from being a little confused as to how the game actually works with the Move (It doesn't use the orb, at all) it's absolutely fine.

                                At the moment I've only played a little with my infinite ammo shotgun on the veteran difficulty, so I haven't needed to do much in the way of fine tuning of the aim yet, hopefully I'll give that a go tomorrow and play with one of the pistols/magnums for a bit.

                                The only problem I'm having really is motivating myself to play through the game again. I did quite enjoy it, but I'm not sure I did enough to play through it a second time alone. :/

                                Sheva is still hot, inventory management is still infuriatingly clumsy.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X