GT - I love the low angle you used on the swans.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
The Photography Thread
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Originally posted by Richard.John View PostDid you consider the 24-70 mm L at all? I know you are FF with the 5D, so did that have an impact?
Thanks for the comments btw. The low was achieved by holding the camera just above the water. I would normally lie down for such a shot, however I didn't want to be covered in bird cack!.
Pete, a no from me. A bit of light to her face would have made it a yes!
BTW you been taking pictures of that shipwreck?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ginger Tosser View PostPete, a no from me. A bit of light to her face would have made it a yes!
BTW you been taking pictures of that shipwreck?
I haven't taken any shots of the wreck, I probably should try but so many people are heading over that the roads are jammed. Brandscombe is a tiny little village and getting to the beach isn't easy either. Maybe able to see it from Sidmouth beach so I'll walk down tomorrow lunchtime.
I suspect it'll be a pain in the arse this wreck, the people trying to sort it out have already taken over part of our building!
Comment
-
Fair point about the shadow, still nice outline.
I had a tweak of the image on Photoshop, your right. Best left in the shadow. Singing does have that habit of contorting the face!
Looks an impressive place Shotski, image is lacking colour, though that might be down to the metering and bright sky. Also it's not level. However i like the mist been highlighted by the sun. Shooting into the sun is always difficult.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ginger Tosser View PostLooks an impressive place Shotski, image is lacking colour, though that might be down to the metering and bright sky. Also it's not level. However i like the mist been highlighted by the sun. Shooting into the sun is always difficult.
Comment
-
Film bodies are very cheap (2nd hand) at the moment and if you develop at cost then its more of a bonus.
Digital has its advantages in the fact that you can instantly review your shots and retake if necessary. The initial outlay on digital can be higher Camera/Memory/Image software but i find i shoot more on digital now than i ever did before. This year i've taken around 5000 shots. Probably more than my previous 10 years with film.
Comment
-
Another vote here for digital as you are able to experiment in way that is impossible with film (unless you can stomach the film and development costs). Film is great but the future belongs to silicon.Last edited by Richard.John; 21-01-2007, 23:40.
Comment
-
My colleague got the shout to take shots of the wreck in Branscombe - http://www.ianpain.co.uk/spgm/index.php?spgmGal=napoli
I was in the wrong place at the wrong time!
Comment
-
Unfortunately half the stuff has already been nicked by the locals. Apart from the cars, jeeps and motorbikes! There were loads of trainers and cosmetic products that have gone. Best sale in devon at the mo! Local radio has been telling people how to get down onto the beach and get by the police which is pretty stupid...
The police are trying to shut down the area but there isn't much they can do (not easy to close a mile of beach!).
I think I've missed my opportunity to get some photos which I'm a bit annoyed about, but never mind.
Comment
Comment